alphaomega Posted January 28, 2010 Posted January 28, 2010 (edited) Well, I don't want to always be the one posting here. Let's see some of YOUR screenies. I would but my system does not change very much (other than the background changes every hour).I usually only take snapshots after a major update of some sort...as self evidence that my frankenstein setup actually works.Anyway, here is the most recent.slackware current. kernel 2.6.32.5, kde 4.3.4, xorg 1.4.2, nvidia 71.86.11Cheers Edited January 28, 2010 by alphaomega Quote
SueD Posted January 28, 2010 Posted January 28, 2010 Well, I don't want to always be the one posting here. Let's see some of YOUR screenies. Gnome-screenshot doesn't seem to be working for me in Arch. Quote
V.T. Eric Layton Posted January 28, 2010 Author Posted January 28, 2010 I like that . Almost tempts me to try KDE4 again. @ Sue... how are you trying to do it? With the Print Screen key on your keyboard? Nothing happens? If that's the case, you have to bind your Print Screen key to Gnome-screenshot in the keyboard preferences. Quote
SueD Posted January 28, 2010 Posted January 28, 2010 When I hit Print Screen, I get the following message... There was an error running gnome-screenshot:Failed to execute child process "gnome-screenshot" (No such file or directory) Quote
V.T. Eric Layton Posted January 28, 2010 Author Posted January 28, 2010 Ah... you have the key-binding, but you don't have the app. # pacman -S gnome-screenshot Quote
SueD Posted January 28, 2010 Posted January 28, 2010 Ah... you have the key-binding, but you don't have the app.# pacman -S gnome-screenshot Nope, I tried that right after I got that message[root@localhost sue]# pacman -S gnome-screenshotgnome-screenshot package not found, searching for group...error: 'gnome-screenshot': not found in sync db Quote
V.T. Eric Layton Posted January 29, 2010 Author Posted January 29, 2010 Umm... it's a complete package of Gnome goodies called gnome-utils. Sorry, I forgot about that. Try again.... # pacman -S gnome-utils Quote
SueD Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Umm... it's a complete package of Gnome goodies called gnome-utils. Sorry, I forgot about that. Try again.... # pacman -S gnome-utils Well geez, you'd think I would have figured that out on my own. Thanks! Quote
SueD Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 (edited) Here's mine. See? It's dark, and red, and umm, dark red.Hmm, seems I forgot how to post linkable images. Edited January 29, 2010 by SueD Quote
zlim Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Mine stays the same - Easy Mode, the way it arrived from the factoryhttp://www.eeeeducation.com/images/asus_ho...n_eeePC_600.jpgMy background is pale blue and the tabs are blue.I tried to follow directions to change the background to a marble-looking style; naturally, it did not work.I have a few wallpapers in Advanced desktop but rarely boot into it. Quote
Urmas Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Hmm, seems I forgot how to post linkable images. I see you're using ImageBam... after uploading your image, copy/paste the "BBCode". Do NOT put it into "image tags".Looky looky - clicky clicky: a "clickable" thumbnail! To do the same with ImageShack: copy/paste the "Forum Thumbnail" bit. Again, do NOT use the image tags.Clear as mud? Quote
V.T. Eric Layton Posted January 29, 2010 Author Posted January 29, 2010 @ Sue... bit small for the over-45 eyes. @ Liz... colorful! I like colorful! =====Seems I'm in a dragon mood this week. Here's slack-dragon in bisque with accompanying Xfce theme:DesktopTheme Quote
V.T. Eric Layton Posted January 29, 2010 Author Posted January 29, 2010 Oooh! Dark... and weird-looking. Quote
SueD Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Oooh! Dark... and weird-looking. Yup, it's very me. Quote
V.T. Eric Layton Posted January 29, 2010 Author Posted January 29, 2010 Are you dark and weird-looking too?You've got nice legs. Quote
Urmas Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Ahem... Sue? The character between copywrong and n€uro? Quote
SueD Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Are you dark and weird-looking too?You've got nice legs. Nice but this one looks friendlier. Ahem... Sue? The character between copywrong and n€uro? Pffffffffft! Right over my head Urmas. Quote
V.T. Eric Layton Posted January 29, 2010 Author Posted January 29, 2010 Yeah... but that's a boy moose. Quote
Urmas Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Pffffffffft! Right over my head Urmas. Negative, Sueston... right over MY head. Here, looky: between © and €... what the heck is it? Quote
SueD Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Negative, Sueston... right over MY head. Here, looky: between © and €... what the heck is it? I forgot that was up there.LOL It's the Arabic letter theh. Yeah... but that's a boy moose. So's yours. ;)This one's a girl... Quote
V.T. Eric Layton Posted January 29, 2010 Author Posted January 29, 2010 The image link said: biology-blog.com/images/blogs/10-2007/female-moose-12901.jpg Did they lie to me? :(Myeh... whaddo I know about meese... or females for that matter? Quote
réjean Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 (edited) Whatever they name it, Eric. A female moose ( cow ), doesn't have antlers ( a rack ).I've seen may of them! One time I was tree-planting and if you want to be fast you don't stretch all the way back up after banding. So I looked where I would plant my next tree ( 2 steps ahead, about 6 feet, 2 metres ) and I saw a set of hooves so I stopped. I stood up and notice a humongous male with a 14 pointers ( the little extensions on its antlers ) looking at me.I didn't know what to do but when I saw it slowly retrieving I didn't object. Edited January 29, 2010 by réjean Quote
SueD Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Whatever they name it, Eric. A female moose ( cow ), doesn't have antlers ( a rack ).I guess they don't have too many moose wandering around Florida, eh Réjean? Quote
V.T. Eric Layton Posted January 29, 2010 Author Posted January 29, 2010 A female with no rack? You know, there are surgical augmentation options nowadays. Quote
SueD Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 The image link said: biology-blog.com/images/blogs/10-2007/female-moose-12901.jpg Did they lie to me? Myeh... whaddo I know about meese... or females for that matter? Aww, he's still a nice moose. Quote
V.T. Eric Layton Posted January 29, 2010 Author Posted January 29, 2010 I guess they don't have too many moose wandering around Florida, eh Réjean? We have a Moose Lodge. Does that count? Quote
SueD Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 A female with no rack? You know, there are surgical augmentation options nowadays. Not that kind of rack. Sheesh!We have a Moose Lodge. Does that count?Depends. Do they have nice racks? Quote
V.T. Eric Layton Posted January 29, 2010 Author Posted January 29, 2010 Ah! Oh.The Moose Lodge might have a wine rack... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.