Measure CPU Speed for your distros

[Frank Golden]

Hi Folks, again this may or may not be of interest but comparing XP to Ubuntu Gutsy to 4 million digits. Gutsy completed in 113 seconds and XP completed in 143 seconds!! That's 79% quicker.Statistically more relevant? Don't know. This with the same computer I posted the earlier results with.BTW, with the Windows version you can go as high as 32 million using the GUI. With the Linux version you change the number in the command

./super_pi 20

to 21 to get 2 million digits and to 22 to get 4 million etc. I'm not going to try it in linux to 32 million (would probably take days and stress the daylights out of even a Core2Duo) but the factor would be 25.I don't know if it related but I have noticed that it takes much less time to copy large files (like my MP3 collection, 9GB) with Ubuntu Gutsy than with XP!Thank you anil for the great timekiller and a way to prove a point. :hysterical:Incidentally the Windows version generates a text document showing what Pi to 4 million digits looks like, it is 4 MB in size!

Edited December 17, 2007 by Frank Golden

[Frank Golden]

oops posted in wrong thread

Edited December 18, 2007 by Frank Golden

[réjean]

Ha! Who can claim to get such slow result? From a AMD-K62/500 with this much memory;

[rejean@upstairs2 super_pi]$  free			 total	   used	   free	 shared	buffers	 cachedMem:		646172	 383048	 263124		  0	  54656	 186796-/+ buffers/cache:	 141596	 504576Swap:	  1044184		  0	1044184

and ladies and gentlemen here is the result;

End of calculation.	Time=	 817.909 Sec. End of data output.	Time=	   1.294 Sec. Total calculation(I/O) time=	 819.202(	  25.744) Sec.

:w00t:P.S. Oops! I forgot to say that I am running PCLinuxOS Big Daddy! But hey! don't blame the distro.

Edited December 18, 2007 by réjean

[Anil]

Results so far:

[V.T. Eric Layton]

COOL!

[raymac46]

ray@raycomp2:~/Documents$ ./super_pi 20 Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually. pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the compilation. ------ Started super_pi run : Wed Jan 9 08:10:10 EST 2008 Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits End of initialization. Time= 0.944 Sec. I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.396 Sec. I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.580 Sec. I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.584 Sec. I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.576 Sec. I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.572 Sec. I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.568 Sec. I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.592 Sec. I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.592 Sec. I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.588 Sec. I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.584 Sec. I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.592 Sec. I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.564 Sec. I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.572 Sec. I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.568 Sec. I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.572 Sec. I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.560 Sec. I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.540 Sec. I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.512 Sec. I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.404 Sec. End of main loop End of calculation. Time= 31.710 Sec. End of data output. Time= 0.148 Sec. Total calculation(I/O) time= 31.858( 1.152) Sec. ------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Jan 9 08:10:42 EST 2008ray@raycomp2:~/Documents$ This is with an Athlon 64 X2 4600+ 2GB RAM (less 128MB for graphics) and Ubuntu 7.10 32 bit. OK for rather a trailing edge system I suppose.

[Anil]

This is with an Athlon 64 X2 4600+ 2GB RAM (less 128MB for graphics) and Ubuntu 7.10 32 bit. OK for rather a trailing edge system I suppose.

This is in line with other AMD64x2 results BTW do you have 512 KB L2 Cache? Edited January 9, 2008 by Anil

[raymac46]

This is in line with other AMD64x2 results BTW do you have 512MB L2 Cash?

http://www.pricegrabber.ca/search_techspec...sterid=23824746

[Anil]

http://www.pricegrabber.ca/search_techspec...sterid=23824746

Sorry for the typo...I meant 512 KB L2 Cache not 512 MB !!

[raymac46]

Now for the turtle races - Pentium II 266 with 160 MB RAM Vector Linux 5.8: Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually. pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the compilation. ------ Started super_pi run : Wed Jan 9 11:17:23 EST 2008 Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits End of initialization. Time= 5.364 Sec. I= 1 L= 0 Time= 16.389 Sec. I= 2 L= 0 Time= 18.792 Sec. I= 3 L= 1 Time= 18.763 Sec. I= 4 L= 2 Time= 18.852 Sec. I= 5 L= 5 Time= 18.780 Sec. I= 6 L= 10 Time= 18.754 Sec. I= 7 L= 21 Time= 18.754 Sec. I= 8 L= 43 Time= 18.844 Sec. I= 9 L= 87 Time= 18.754 Sec. I=10 L= 174 Time= 18.782 Sec. I=11 L= 349 Time= 18.808 Sec. I=12 L= 698 Time= 18.752 Sec. I=13 L= 1396 Time= 18.754 Sec. I=14 L= 2794 Time= 18.742 Sec. I=15 L= 5588 Time= 18.702 Sec. I=16 L= 11176 Time= 18.616 Sec. I=17 L= 22353 Time= 18.391 Sec. I=18 L= 44707 Time= 17.810 Sec. I=19 L= 89415 Time= 16.583 Sec. End of main loop End of calculation. Time= 370.757 Sec. End of data output. Time= 1.800 Sec. Total calculation(I/O) time= 372.556( 12.736) Sec. ------ Ended super_pi run : Wed Jan 9 11:24:04 EST 2008vector:/~/documentsray:$

[raymac46]

Can't get super_pi to execute on my crappiest computer (P133MMX with 80MB of ram. It hangs after the shell command and says it can't find the executable pi (even though it's in the same directory.) I think the shell used in Deli Linux is a little different. Just as well because it's probably going to take all day to run the calculation anyway.

Edited January 9, 2008 by raymac46

[Bruno]

On my new computer: CPU: Core 2 Quad 6600RAM: 4 GB HD: Western Digital Raptor 10,000rpm SATAIIMandriva 2008 ( 32bits . . . still have to test 64bits before I really switch to it )

 Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually. pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the compilation. ------ Started super_pi run : Fri Feb 22 19:38:37 CET 2008Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits End of initialization. Time=	   0.320 Sec. I= 1 L=	   0		Time=	   0.780 Sec. I= 2 L=	   0		Time=	   1.030 Sec. I= 3 L=	   1		Time=	   0.910 Sec. I= 4 L=	   2		Time=	   0.930 Sec. I= 5 L=	   5		Time=	   0.930 Sec. I= 6 L=	  10		Time=	   1.030 Sec. I= 7 L=	  21		Time=	   1.170 Sec. I= 8 L=	  43		Time=	   0.860 Sec. I= 9 L=	  87		Time=	   0.960 Sec. I=10 L=	 174		Time=	   0.890 Sec. I=11 L=	 349		Time=	   0.930 Sec. I=12 L=	 698		Time=	   0.970 Sec. I=13 L=	1396		Time=	   1.000 Sec. I=14 L=	2794		Time=	   0.810 Sec. I=15 L=	5588		Time=	   0.810 Sec. I=16 L=   11176		Time=	   0.860 Sec. I=17 L=   22353		Time=	   0.930 Sec. I=18 L=   44707		Time=	   0.760 Sec. I=19 L=   89415		Time=	   0.700 Sec. End of main loop End of calculation.	Time=	  18.210 Sec. End of data output.	Time=	   0.100 Sec. Total calculation(I/O) time=	  18.310(	   0.710) Sec. ------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Feb 23 08:22:11 CET 2008

:DB) Bruno

[teacher]

I found a Mac version.

 Start of PI calculation up to 128 decimal digits End of initialization. Time=	   0.024 Sec. I= 1 L=	   0		Time=	   0.018 Sec. I= 2 L=	   0		Time=	   0.011 Sec. I= 3 L=	   1		Time=	   0.007 Sec. I= 4 L=	   2		Time=	   0.006 Sec. I= 5 L=	   5		Time=	   0.005 Sec. I= 6 L=	  10		Time=	   0.003 Sec. End of main loop End of calculation.	Time=	   0.079 Sec. End of data output.	Time=	   0.002 Sec. Total calculation(I/O) time=	   0.081(	   0.028) Sec. ------ Ended super_pi run : Fri Feb 22 19:59:22 EST 2008

I don't know that it is quite the same. Here is where I found it:http://ocing3.free.fr/FTP/overclocking/sup...b/exec_Mac_OSX/

[boilertech]

Ubuntu 7.10AMD 64 3000+ (about 2ghz)1ghz ram Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits End of initialization. Time= 0.884 Sec. I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.616 Sec. I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.848 Sec. I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.836 Sec. I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.836 Sec. I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.868 Sec. I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.840 Sec. I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.840 Sec. I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.836 Sec. I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.864 Sec. I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.880 Sec. I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.876 Sec. I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.828 Sec. I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.876 Sec. I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.848 Sec. I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.864 Sec. I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.796 Sec. I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.820 Sec. I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.760 Sec. I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.616 Sec. End of main loop End of calculation. Time= 36.882 Sec. End of data output. Time= 0.176 Sec. Total calculation(I/O) time= 37.058( 0.952) Sec.

Can't get super_pi to execute on my crappiest computer (P133MMX with 80MB of ram. It hangs after the shell command and says it can't find the executable pi (even though it's in the same directory.) I think the shell used in Deli Linux is a little different. Just as well because it's probably going to take all day to run the calculation anyway.

I had to use this command ./super_pi 20

[sunrat]

On my new computer:CPU: Core 2 Quad 6600RAM: 4 GBHD: Western Digital Raptor 10,000rpm SATAII

Bitchin' new computer Bruno! What mobo and chipset is it?It seems to me that it may be running super_pi in only a single core, as I would have expected it to blitz my (last year's model, well mid 06 really} Core2Duo. It only uses a single core when I check for it. If it could run multi-threaded I'm sure CPU comparison would be more meaningful. Could you check with gkrellm to see if that's the case?Always dreamed of a Raptor HD for audio work, but so far the 7200 WD Caviar drives are doing fine. I would also be keen to see if you get faster results running Sidux, as I did.

[Bruno]

Bitchin' new computer Bruno! What mobo and chipset is it?It seems to me that it may be running super_pi in only a single core, as I would have expected it to blitz my (last year's model, well mid 06 really} Core2Duo. It only uses a single core when I check for it. If it could run multi-threaded I'm sure CPU comparison would be more meaningful. Could you check with gkrellm to see if that's the case?Always dreamed of a Raptor HD for audio work, but so far the 7200 WD Caviar drives are doing fine. I would also be keen to see if you get faster results running Sidux, as I did.

The Mobo is a GigaByte S775 P35-DS3P ATX FTB1333 ( chipset Intel P35 ) . . and when running Pi it uses all 4 cores ( CPU0 and CPU2 the most and CPU1 + CPU3 a bit less )This morning it is even faster:

 Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits End of initialization. Time=	   0.320 Sec. I= 1 L=	   0		Time=	   0.780 Sec. I= 2 L=	   0		Time=	   1.030 Sec. I= 3 L=	   1		Time=	   0.910 Sec. I= 4 L=	   2		Time=	   0.930 Sec. I= 5 L=	   5		Time=	   0.930 Sec. I= 6 L=	  10		Time=	   1.030 Sec. I= 7 L=	  21		Time=	   1.170 Sec. I= 8 L=	  43		Time=	   0.860 Sec. I= 9 L=	  87		Time=	   0.960 Sec. I=10 L=	 174		Time=	   0.890 Sec. I=11 L=	 349		Time=	   0.930 Sec. I=12 L=	 698		Time=	   0.970 Sec. I=13 L=	1396		Time=	   1.000 Sec. I=14 L=	2794		Time=	   0.810 Sec. I=15 L=	5588		Time=	   0.810 Sec. I=16 L=   11176		Time=	   0.860 Sec. I=17 L=   22353		Time=	   0.930 Sec. I=18 L=   44707		Time=	   0.760 Sec. I=19 L=   89415		Time=	   0.700 Sec. End of main loop End of calculation.	Time=	  18.210 Sec. End of data output.	Time=	   0.100 Sec. Total calculation(I/O) time=	  18.310(	   0.710) Sec. ------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Feb 23 08:22:11 CET 2008

Bruno

[Bruno]

Here is the same test done on a 64Bits install:

 Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually. pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the compilation. ------ Started super_pi run : Sun Feb 24 09:29:09 CET 2008 Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits End of initialization. Time=	   0.310 Sec. I= 1 L=	   0		Time=	   0.870 Sec. I= 2 L=	   0		Time=	   1.060 Sec. I= 3 L=	   1		Time=	   0.780 Sec. I= 4 L=	   2		Time=	   0.800 Sec. I= 5 L=	   5		Time=	   0.780 Sec. I= 6 L=	  10		Time=	   0.790 Sec. I= 7 L=	  21		Time=	   0.800 Sec. I= 8 L=	  43		Time=	   0.790 Sec. I= 9 L=	  87		Time=	   0.790 Sec. I=10 L=	 174		Time=	   0.790 Sec. I=11 L=	 349		Time=	   0.790 Sec. I=12 L=	 698		Time=	   0.780 Sec. I=13 L=	1396		Time=	   0.870 Sec. I=14 L=	2794		Time=	   0.970 Sec. I=15 L=	5588		Time=	   0.930 Sec. I=16 L=   11176		Time=	   0.840 Sec. I=17 L=   22353		Time=	   0.840 Sec. I=18 L=   44707		Time=	   0.750 Sec. I=19 L=   89415		Time=	   0.870 Sec. End of main loop End of calculation.	Time=	  17.050 Sec. End of data output.	Time=	   0.100 Sec. Total calculation(I/O) time=	  17.150(	   0.590) Sec.

64bits is indeed slightly faster then 32bits . . . :thumbsup: Bruno

[Anil]

I found a Mac version.

 Start of PI calculation up to 128 decimal digits End of initialization. Time=	   0.024 Sec. I= 1 L=	   0		Time=	   0.018 Sec. I= 2 L=	   0		Time=	   0.011 Sec. I= 3 L=	   1		Time=	   0.007 Sec. I= 4 L=	   2		Time=	   0.006 Sec. I= 5 L=	   5		Time=	   0.005 Sec. I= 6 L=	  10		Time=	   0.003 Sec. End of main loop End of calculation.	Time=	   0.079 Sec. End of data output.	Time=	   0.002 Sec. Total calculation(I/O) time=	   0.081(	   0.028) Sec. ------ Ended super_pi run : Fri Feb 22 19:59:22 EST 2008

I don't know that it is quite the same. Here is where I found it:http://ocing3.free.fr/FTP/overclocking/sup...b/exec_Mac_OSX/

Hello TeacherIt is the same Superpi program for Mac. Will you please post the result for 20 iterations ?(calculation for one million digits of Pi)

On my new computer: CPU: Core 2 Quad 6600RAM: 4 GB HD: Western Digital Raptor 10,000rpm SATAIIMandriva 2008 ( 32bits . . . still have to test 64bits before I really switch to it )

 Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually. pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the compilation. ------ Started super_pi run : Fri Feb 22 19:38:37 CET 2008Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits End of initialization. Time=	   0.320 Sec. I= 1 L=	   0		Time=	   0.780 Sec. I= 2 L=	   0		Time=	   1.030 Sec. I= 3 L=	   1		Time=	   0.910 Sec. I= 4 L=	   2		Time=	   0.930 Sec. I= 5 L=	   5		Time=	   0.930 Sec. I= 6 L=	  10		Time=	   1.030 Sec. I= 7 L=	  21		Time=	   1.170 Sec. I= 8 L=	  43		Time=	   0.860 Sec. I= 9 L=	  87		Time=	   0.960 Sec. I=10 L=	 174		Time=	   0.890 Sec. I=11 L=	 349		Time=	   0.930 Sec. I=12 L=	 698		Time=	   0.970 Sec. I=13 L=	1396		Time=	   1.000 Sec. I=14 L=	2794		Time=	   0.810 Sec. I=15 L=	5588		Time=	   0.810 Sec. I=16 L=   11176		Time=	   0.860 Sec. I=17 L=   22353		Time=	   0.930 Sec. I=18 L=   44707		Time=	   0.760 Sec. I=19 L=   89415		Time=	   0.700 Sec. End of main loop End of calculation.	Time=	  18.210 Sec. End of data output.	Time=	   0.100 Sec. Total calculation(I/O) time=	  18.310(	   0.710) Sec. ------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Feb 23 08:22:11 CET 2008

:DB) Bruno

Hi Bruno, your new computer is Numero Uno

[Bruno]

Hi Bruno, your new computer is Numero Uno

LOL . . yep isn't it great . . LOL . . But for how long ? I was reading this afternoon that Intel is planning 6-Core processors :)Anyway . . . did you see that the Mandriva 64Bits install did even faster ?

End of calculation.	Time=	  17.050 Sec. End of data output.	Time=	   0.100 Sec. Total calculation(I/O) time=	  17.150(	   0.590) Sec.

Post #47 Bruno

[teacher]

Ok, I finally figured out what I was doing wrong. Silly me. Anyway here it is on my Macbook Pro (20 months old)

------ Started super_pi run : Sun Feb 24 20:01:47 EST 2008 Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits End of initialization. Time=	   0.676 Sec. I= 1 L=	   0		Time=	   1.883 Sec. I= 2 L=	   0		Time=	   2.133 Sec. I= 3 L=	   1		Time=	   2.124 Sec. I= 4 L=	   2		Time=	   2.122 Sec. I= 5 L=	   5		Time=	   2.117 Sec. I= 6 L=	  10		Time=	   2.116 Sec. I= 7 L=	  21		Time=	   2.124 Sec. I= 8 L=	  43		Time=	   2.127 Sec. I= 9 L=	  87		Time=	   2.120 Sec. I=10 L=	 174		Time=	   2.116 Sec. I=11 L=	 349		Time=	   2.115 Sec. I=12 L=	 698		Time=	   2.103 Sec. I=13 L=	1396		Time=	   2.102 Sec. I=14 L=	2794		Time=	   2.112 Sec. I=15 L=	5588		Time=	   2.097 Sec. I=16 L=   11176		Time=	   2.077 Sec. I=17 L=   22353		Time=	   2.035 Sec. I=18 L=   44707		Time=	   1.975 Sec. I=19 L=   89415		Time=	   1.848 Sec. End of main loop End of calculation.	Time=	  41.771 Sec. End of data output.	Time=	   0.328 Sec. Total calculation(I/O) time=	  42.100(	   3.022) Sec. ------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Feb 24 20:02:29 EST 2008

I was able to equally run the Linux version and the Mac version. It made no difference.

[RD1]

Acer 9410 Laptop, Centrino Duo 1.6Ghz, 1GB Ram, Ubuntu 7.10

rodger@Bodhisattva:~/super_pi$ ./super_pi 20 Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually. pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the compilation. ------ Started super_pi run : Sun Feb 24 21:01:34 EST 2008 Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits End of initialization. Time= 0.444 Sec. I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.356 Sec. I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.568 Sec. I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.536 Sec. I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.532 Sec. I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.532 Sec. I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.532 Sec. I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.536 Sec. I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.532 Sec. I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.536 Sec. I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.536 Sec. I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.532 Sec. I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.532 Sec. I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.536 Sec. I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.528 Sec. I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.520 Sec. I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.520 Sec. I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.496 Sec. I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.456 Sec. I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.356 Sec. End of main loop End of calculation. Time= 30.326 Sec. End of data output. Time= 0.164 Sec. Total calculation(I/O) time= 30.490( 0.912) Sec. ------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Feb 24 21:02:05 EST 2008rodger@Bodhisattva:~/super_pi$

[Anil]

Results so far :Thanks

[sunrat]

Anyway . . . did you see that the Mandriva 64Bits install did even faster ?CODEEnd of calculation. Time= 17.050 Sec.End of data output. Time= 0.100 Sec.Total calculation(I/O) time= 17.150( 0.590) Sec.

"Curses"! he says in a voice imitating The Penguin from the old Batman TV shows," Now I'll have to get a faster computer!"They say you can O/C an E6400 C2D chip to 3GHz ....................... Oh, well 3 months of fame is more than most get.

[Bruno]

"Curses"! he says in a voice imitating The Penguin from the old Batman TV shows," Now I'll have to get a faster computer!"They say you can O/C an E6400 C2D chip to 3GHz ....................... Oh, well 3 months of fame is more than most get.

LOL. . . . Like I said above: "for how long ? I was reading this afternoon that Intel is planning 6-Core processors" . . . . ( well that would be something wouldn't it ? ) Bruno

[sunrat]

Time to dig up this old thread.I just ran super_pi 20 on the same computer, same Debian installation, with the latest 2.6.26-1 kernel.Debian lenny/sidLinux brain 2.6.26-1-686 #1 SMP Thu Oct 9 15:18:09 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/LinuxTotal calculation(I/O) time= 18.905( 0.704) Sec.That's nearly 5% faster than 2.6.22-3 based system in less than 1 year. Good work Debian and kernel devs! Will post EeePC 900 results soon too. It took about 70 seconds.

[quint]

orca: Intel Core2Duo 6400 - 2.13GHz /w 4GB DDR2 PCLOS 2009 Beta1

Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits End of initialization. Time= 0.292 Sec. I= 1 L= 0 Time= 0.920 Sec. I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.056 Sec. I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.056 Sec. I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.056 Sec. I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.056 Sec. I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.052 Sec. I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.056 Sec. I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.052 Sec. I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.056 Sec. I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.056 Sec. I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.052 Sec. I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.056 Sec. I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.052 Sec. I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.052 Sec. I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.048 Sec. I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.040 Sec. I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.028 Sec. I=18 L= 44707 Time= 0.996 Sec. I=19 L= 89415 Time= 0.936 Sec. End of main loop End of calculation. Time= 20.789 Sec. End of data output. Time= 0.112 Sec. Total calculation(I/O) time= 20.901( 0.696) Sec. ------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Oct 19 11:34:35 CDT 2008

Edited February 23, 2009 by quint

[Anil]

Eee PC - 701 4GLinux 2.6.22.15.tex3 i686 Intel Celeron M processor - 900 MHz running fluxflux-eee(live)

super_pi 20 Total calculation(I/O) time= 71.403( 1.449) Sec.

The default system running Xandros is way too slow because of low clock speedLinux eeepc 2.6.21.4 i686 running Xandrossuper_pi 20 Total calculation(I/O) time= 103.031( 2.086) Sec. Edited October 20, 2008 by Anil

[Urmas]

Your i286...

You didn't actually... you did, huh?

[sunrat]

Your machine does not appear capable of calculating the request equation in your lifespan.Please come back when you have a longer life span.

I love it when programmers make me laugh.

[Anil]

Your machine does not appear capable of calculating the request equation in your lifespan.Please come back when you have a longer life span.

That's a nice one Temmu...