Jump to content

Arch update perculiarity ? mujs: signature from "Daniel Bermond <dbermond@archlinux.org>" is marginal trust


abarbarian
 Share

Recommended Posts

abarbarian

A few days ago I tried to do an Arch update and got this,

 

(217/217) checking keys in keyring                 [######################] 100%
downloading required keys...
:: Import PGP key C132293954BBE4AD, "Sergej Pupykin <spupykin@archlinux.org>"? [Y/n] y
:: Import PGP key E85B8683EB48BC95, "Daniel Bermond <dbermond@archlinux.org>"? [Y/n] y
(217/217) checking package integrity               [######################] 100%
error: libjxl: key "80247D99EABD3A4D1E3A1836E85B8683EB48BC95" is unknown
:: Import PGP key 80247D99EABD3A4D1E3A1836E85B8683EB48BC95? [Y/n] n
:: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/libjxl-0.6.1-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)).
Do you want to delete it? [Y/n] y
error: mujs: key "80247D99EABD3A4D1E3A1836E85B8683EB48BC95" is unknown
:: Import PGP key 80247D99EABD3A4D1E3A1836E85B8683EB48BC95? [Y/n] n
:: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/mujs-1.2.0-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)).
Do you want to delete it? [Y/n] y
error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package)
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.

 Today I tried again and got this,

 

(253/253) checking keys in keyring                 [######################] 100%
(253/253) checking package integrity               [######################] 100%
error: libjxl: signature from "Daniel Bermond <dbermond@archlinux.org>" is marginal trust
:: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/libjxl-0.6.1-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)).
Do you want to delete it? [Y/n] y
error: mujs: signature from "Daniel Bermond <dbermond@archlinux.org>" is marginal trust
:: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/mujs-1.2.0-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)).
Do you want to delete it? [Y/n] y
error: failed to commit transaction (invalid or corrupted package)
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.

 

I can not find any information on this on the net. Bit stumped ?????????????????????????? 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

securitybreach

Sorry, I was away yesterday. I ran into the same thing on my main laptop and you basically just have to refresh your keys:
 

sudo pacman-key --init

sudo pacman-key --populate Archlinux

sudo pacman-key --refresh-keys

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

abarbarian

That

 

# pacman-key --refresh-keys

 

sorted things out, it took quite q while to run though.

 

Now I just have to deal with the "sudoers.pacnew"  😎

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

securitybreach
5 hours ago, abarbarian said:

That

 

# pacman-key --refresh-keys

 

sorted things out, it took quite q while to run though.

 

Now I just have to deal with the "sudoers.pacnew"  😎

 

 

Good deal. I think a couple of developers changed their keys and it just had to be updated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
securitybreach
7 minutes ago, wa4chq said:
sudo pacman --refresh-with-slackware 

 

But then you lose packages and package signing..... ;)

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...