raymac46 Posted February 22, 2021 Share Posted February 22, 2021 I installed this kernel using MX Linux installer as an attempt to solve my Microphone problem. Didn't help but the kernel looks like it works OK. What is the advantage of using Liquorix over the vanilla Debian kernel that ships with MX Linux? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunrat Posted February 22, 2021 Share Posted February 22, 2021 I use Liquorix for audio production as it gives better performance for that. Probably wouldn't be noticeable for everyday use. For example the Bullseye install I did last week caused about 70% DSP usage for a small Mixbus session with the default kernel and around 30% with Liquorix. The main difference afaik are kernel config parameters CONFIG_PREEMPT=y , CONFIG_NO_HZ=y , and CONFIG_HZ=1000 although there are others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.