raymac46 2,773 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 I installed this kernel using MX Linux installer as an attempt to solve my Microphone problem. Didn't help but the kernel looks like it works OK. What is the advantage of using Liquorix over the vanilla Debian kernel that ships with MX Linux? Link to post Share on other sites
sunrat 2,315 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 I use Liquorix for audio production as it gives better performance for that. Probably wouldn't be noticeable for everyday use. For example the Bullseye install I did last week caused about 70% DSP usage for a small Mixbus session with the default kernel and around 30% with Liquorix. The main difference afaik are kernel config parameters CONFIG_PREEMPT=y , CONFIG_NO_HZ=y , and CONFIG_HZ=1000 although there are others. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now