To Quote or MultiQuote

[crp 769]

As can be seen by Eric's post (#15), a quote of a quote is not working correctly.

yes, yes, Eric - I realize this is not 'On Topic'

[LilBambi 3,279]

Quotes within quotes don't work unless you use MultiQuote.

[V.T. Eric Layton 6,011]

The bardette doth speaketh soothe.

[LilBambi 3,279]

What does [color=#282828][font=helvetica, arial, sans-serif]bardette mean? [/font][/color]

[V.T. Eric Layton 6,011]

That's a lady bard... as in Shakespeare; in reference to your possibly inadvertent lampooning of "To be or not to be; that is the question" in the title to this thread.

[LilBambi 3,279]

Ah, Cool!

BTW: It was intentional actually. Edited May 10, 2012 by LilBambi

[V.T. Eric Layton 6,011]

I don't have a need to multiquote too often, but I guess I need to go test this and see how it actually works.

[LilBambi 3,279]

[quote name='V.T. Eric Layton' timestamp='1336684254' post='350107']
I don't have a need to multiquote too often, but I guess I need to go test this and see how it actually works.
[/quote]

[quote name='LilBambi' timestamp='1336684710' post='350112']
[/quote]
[quote name='LilBambi' timestamp='1336684055' post='350106']
Ah, Cool!

BTW: It was intentional actually.
[/quote]

There we go!

[quote name='V.T. Eric Layton' timestamp='1336683453' post='350102']
That's a lady bard... as in Shakespeare; in reference to your possibly inadvertent lampooning of "To be or not to be; that is the question" in the title to this thread.
[/quote]
[quote name='LilBambi' timestamp='1336684055' post='350106']
Ah, Cool!

BTW: It was intentional actually.
[/quote]

Interesting.

Literally need to quote from the individual posts. It won't nest them. Very much like it did with the old software.

[V.T. Eric Layton 6,011]

Glad I don't need to do that too often.

[Corrine 2,487]

[quote name='LilBambi' timestamp='1336665045' post='350034']
Quotes within quotes don't work unless you use MultiQuote.
[/quote]
MultiQuote is much cleaner than quotes within quotes.

[quote name='V.T. Eric Layton' timestamp='1336684254' post='350107']
I don't have a need to multiquote too often, but I guess I need to go test this and see how it actually works.
[/quote]
I like MultiQuote because it is then possible to respond to two different posts in one reply without confusing one with the other.

[LilBambi 3,279]

Yes, true on both points Corrine!

[crp 769]

[quote name='Corrine' timestamp='1336762633' post='350190']
MultiQuote is much cleaner than quotes within quotes.


I like MultiQuote because it is then possible to respond to two different posts in one reply without confusing one with the other.
[/quote]
[quote name='Corrine' timestamp='1336762633' post='350190']
MultiQuote is much cleaner than quotes within quotes.


I like MultiQuote because it is then possible to respond to two different posts in one reply without confusing one with the other.
[/quote] ???

[securitybreach 10,014]

I have never really tried the multi-quote before as I have only done them manually but that I may try it out

[quote name='Corrine' timestamp='1336762633' post='350190']
MultiQuote is much cleaner than quotes within quotes.


I like MultiQuote because it is then possible to respond to two different posts in one reply without confusing one with the other.
[/quote]

I just realized that if I type a response and then scroll up and click quote, it automatically posts the quoted text instead of opening up a reply box like the old forum did.
Neat stuff

[Corrine 2,487]

[quote name='crp' timestamp='1336764458' post='350197']
???
[/quote]

It looks like you clicked both MultiQuote and Quote so the post was included twice.