Jump to content


New privacy policy allows scan of Yahoo & AOL mail for targeted ad


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   Corrine

Corrine

    The Mystical Rose

  • Forum Admins
  • 4,186 posts

Posted 15 April 2018 - 03:39 PM

From Oath’s new privacy policy allows it to scan your Yahoo and AOL mail for targeted advertising - The Verge:

Quote

Oath confirmed to CNet that it rolled out a unified privacy policy to its AOL and Yahoo brands. The updated policy (spotted by Jason Kint) states that the company “analyzes and stores all communications content, including email content from incoming and outgoing mail,” which will allow it to “deliver, personalize and develop relevant features, content, advertising and Services.”

The policy also states that the company can “analyze your content and other information (including emails, instant messages, posts photos, attachments, and other communications),” and it singles out messaging from financial institutions, saying that it “may analyze user content around certain interactions with financial institutions.” Oath says that its automated systems will strip out “information that on its own could reasonably identify the recipient.” It might also collect Exchangeable Image File Format (EXIF) data from images that you upload, and utilize image recognition to “identify and tag scenes, color, best crop coordinates, text, actions, objects, or public figures.”

Posted Image

Take a walk through the "Security Garden" -- Where Everything is Coming up Roses!

Remember - A day without laughter is a day wasted.
May the wind sing to you and the sun rise in your heart.

#2 OFFLINE   securitybreach

securitybreach

    CLI Phreak

  • Forum Admins
  • 23,414 posts

Posted 15 April 2018 - 03:50 PM

I do not understand why anyone would ever think that webmail was ever private in the least little bit. If your data is hosted on a company's server, why would you think that the company would not be scanning their data? Once it's on their servers, it is their data.
Posted ImagePosted Image Posted Image
CNI Radio/G+ Profile/Configs/PGP Key/comhack π

"Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain." -George Orwell, 1984

#3 OFFLINE   crp

crp

    Discussion Deity

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,076 posts

Posted 15 April 2018 - 04:41 PM

View Postsecuritybreach, on 15 April 2018 - 03:50 PM, said:

I do not understand why anyone would ever think that webmail was ever private in the least little bit. If your data is hosted on a company's server, why would you think that the company would not be scanning their data? Once it's on their servers, it is their data.
So you don't Hushmail is being honest about their policy? and don't forget Lavabit. I'm sure there are other examples that users could cite.
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. ~C. S. Lewis

#4 OFFLINE   zlim

zlim

    It's me, plodr

  • Forum MVP
  • 7,084 posts

Posted 16 April 2018 - 11:24 AM

Since privacy policy seems mislabeled because there is no privacy, why not just call it our current policy for users.

Just like the meaningless papers I get from banks on privacy. It basically says, "we share everything with 3rd parties". If you drop us, we still share your information. What a waste of paper.
Liz
Registered Linux User # 401459
Posted Image




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users