securitybreach Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 If you are still running Ubuntu 16.10, which was released last October, it’s time to upgrade. Also known as 'Yakkety Yak', it was released on October 13, 2016, and as per short-term release lifespans, has petered out its nine-month support cycle. If you’re still running 16.10, then it’s time to upgrade to Ubuntu 17.04 which will be supported until the start of 2018. Once a release, such as Ubuntu 16.10, reaches its end of life, it no longer receives any maintenance updates, critical security patches, or updated packages. The long-term support releases are better suited for people who don’t enjoy upgrading their system every six to nine months. https://www.neowin.n...hes-end-of-life 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedon James Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 I don't enjoy upgrading my system every 6-9 months...so it's all LTS for me. But for the record, I don't enjoy upgrading my system every 3-5 years either. Instead of dropping support for their "interim" releases between LTS, I wish Canonical would just make those interim releases a "rolling release". An LTS channel for those who prefer, and a rolling release for those who prefer that. Does anyone actually enjoy reinstalling their OS every 6 to 9 months? 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
securitybreach Posted July 21, 2017 Author Share Posted July 21, 2017 Luckily with a rolling distro, I havent had to do that in a decade. Well not because of a version release.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peachy Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 I don't enjoy upgrading my system every 6-9 months...so it's all LTS for me. But for the record, I don't enjoy upgrading my system every 3-5 years either. Instead of dropping support for their "interim" releases between LTS, I wish Canonical would just make those interim releases a "rolling release". An LTS channel for those who prefer, and a rolling release for those who prefer that. Does anyone actually enjoy reinstalling their OS every 6 to 9 months? You can add the back ports repositories of newer packages into your older system, though couldn't you? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raymac46 Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 If you have your data on a separate partition or drive It's not a big deal to reinstall. I like the 3-5 years of stability something like Linux Mint 18 can provide. The most annoying problems with older releases can occur if you get a new printer or video card. I had nightmares with an AMD card that should have been old enough to work with LM 17 - but did not. The last few times with Linux Mint a dist-upgrade in place worked fine. Probably I have some left over crud but it hasn't crashed anything yet. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.