securitybreach Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Every photo ever taken by Apollo astronauts on moon missions is now available online, on the Project Apollo Archive's Flickr account. That's about 8,400 images, grouped by the roll of film they were shot on. You can finally see all the blurry images, mistakes, and unrecognized gems for yourself. The unprocessed Hasseblad photos (basically raw scans of the negatives) uploaded by the Project Apollo Archive offer a fascinating behind-the-scenes peek at the various moon missions…as well as lots and lots (and lots) of photos detailing the surface of the moon. Here's a very small taste. All photos by NASA/The Project Apollo Archive. http://www.motherjon...-are-now-online 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abarbarian Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Conspiracy theorists were right then. If you do the math it would take 46 years to Photoshop all 8400 pictures 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
securitybreach Posted October 4, 2015 Author Share Posted October 4, 2015 Conspiracy theorists were right then. If you do the math it would take 46 years to Photoshop all 8400 pictures Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Crow Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 They left the place looking like Bondai beach after a night session in the early 70's .Litter louts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V.T. Eric Layton Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 Wow! They took that many photos out there in the Arizona desert? Kodak must have love that. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
securitybreach Posted October 6, 2015 Author Share Posted October 6, 2015 the folks that scanned those didn't know how to set up a scanner, methinks - the contrast is horrible on many of them considering that that was military grade film exposed on an exceptionally high-end camera. High end for 1969+ isn't as high end as nowadays Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abarbarian Posted October 6, 2015 Share Posted October 6, 2015 (edited) the folks that scanned those didn't know how to set up a scanner, methinks - the contrast is horrible on many of them considering that that was military grade film exposed on an exceptionally high-end camera. High end for 1969+ isn't as high end as nowadays Photographers would dispute that statement. Scanners however are a different matter and your statement would hold up Edited October 6, 2015 by abarbarian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.