Jump to content

Microsoft bids for Yahoo


Jeber

Recommended Posts

Microsoft has unveiled an audacious $44.6bn offer to buy search engine giant Yahoo! and take on Google in what would be the technology industry's largest ever takeover.The software giant said its offer valued Yahoo! at $31 per share, representing a 62pc premium to Yahoo!'s closing price on Wall Street last night.Shares in Yahoo!, which had declined 18pc this year before today, soared 51pc to $28.90 in early trading. Microsoft shares slipped $1.30 to $31.30.Yahoo has said it will examine Microsoft's proposal.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtm...bcnmicro701.xmlThis could become the Clash of the Titans '08, MS/Yahoo vs. Google.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My brother, who contracts for the military in IT security, sent me this story this morning.He said that DoD and other government agencies are considering and testing for going to thin clients, like say Google's. Microsoft should be shaking...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The minute the deal is finalized ( if it is ) I'll stop using Yahoo which is my main email account and my internet portal and switch to Google. Well ok I'll check my emails for a few weeks until all my contacts have my google email address.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, If this goes through, I'll ditch my 9 or 10 year old yahoo address because if MS tweaks it, it will have the same weird problems that hotmail and msn live mail have.I'm also wondering where to move my Flickr pictures because MS will probably tell me I need to run XP or Vista to look at my pictures and upload others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if someone tells you they - The Redmond firm that is - just started with Yahoo, and their ultimate goal would be to buy the internet? Isn't that what they are dreaming of?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if someone tells you they - The Redmond firm that is - just started with Yahoo, and their ultimate goal would be to buy the internet? Isn't that what they are dreaming of?
Google already owns the internet and is not selling.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:whistling: both to striker and to b2cm!and to think, i thot it was to gov'ts of the world spying on their respective citizens...
:'( Guess who's at the first three places on the spy top 10 .... What if indeed google bids on yahoo and yahoo accepts it? Would that be a good thing or not so good? B)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Word on the street is that Yahoo will turn down MS's bid. Yahoo really would be a better match with Microsoft than they would be with Google. Yahoo, Microsoft and AOL all still operate on the "portal" concept. Establish a single portal page that contains every bit of information the user could ever want (or at least try to). Google, on the other hand, concentrates more on being everywhere the user already is. AdWords on every site, ubiquitous search boxes, the option to add to a calendar or make a note in a notebook from your email interface.Two entirely different approaches to meeting the needs of the enduser. All indications are that Google has a better approach for the future of the web. In the web 2.0/3.0 future, getting in front of the user where they are will be more effective than trying to entice them to come to your site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I'd rather see Yahoo and Google compete and MS search drop.I use both Yahoo and Google. I can't remember the last time I used MS to search for something. I also don't want Yahho and Google to merge - I like both my yahoo account and Flickr and my gmail account. I wish some philanthropist would help Yahoo out, I'd hate to see them be forced to merge with anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cluttermagnet

We should really be used to this sort of thing by now. 'Merger', 'greenmail', acquisition- whatever we want to call it- it is going forward at a record clip. When was the last time when we, the voters actually had any chance of influencing this headlong plunge into the 'ultimate merger'? Perhaps in the 1950's, when Eisenhower warned about the military/industrial complex? Nobody was paying much attention back then. It's too late now. I give the process perhaps 30 to 50 years to complete, but as I see it, there's no longer any stopping it. Oh, well, it'll be your children's and grandchildren's problem. I won't be around. I am so grateful to have lived most of my life in the later 20th century. Those were the good old days. There are hard times coming...Sometimes a company like Yahoo has no better option than to accept 'rescue' by another greedy, opportunistic company as a lesser of two evils. Failing that, they are often acquired by 'end run' maneuvers such as snapping up all the stock that is community held. That's why it's called greenmail. Same as blackmail, really, and it also involves lots of money. Yahoo may ultimately have no choice but to be acquired- by someone or other. This is the game played by the big money boys, and it is going to make almost everybody's life miserable in the coming decades. Heck, as far as I am concerned, it already has, but that's another subject...Taft-Hartley- what's that? I flatulate in the general direction of your 'Taft-Hartley'. :wacko: :thumbsup:

Edited by Cluttermagnet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yahoo is still seeking a savior. This would seem to validate my opinion that AOL, Yahoo and MS are similar in style and outlook.
Yahoo! set to revive merger talks with AOL after rejecting hostile takeoverYahoo! is seeking to restart merger talks with AOL as a means of defending itself against the $45 billion (£23 billion) hostile bid approach from Microsoft, The Times has learnt.It is understood that Yahoo! and its team of advisers from Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers, the US investment banks, have spent the past week evaluating possible tie-ups with media and technology firms that would save it from being swallowed by Microsoft.It is also understood that one option being explored is to restart merger talks with AOL, the online business owned by Time Warner. Tie-ups with groups such as Google or Disney are also being considered. Although Yahoo! and AOL previously failed to join forces because of differences over price, it is hoped that the urgency created by an unwelcome approach from Microsoft and an impending economic downturn will spur the two into new talks. Google, which offered support to Yahoo! when the Microsoft approach was made public, also has a 5 per cent stake in AOL.Jerry Yang, co-founder of Yahoo!, will today tell Wall Street that his board has rejected the software giant’s cash-and-shares proposal because it significantly undervalues the company. It is believed that the Yahoo! board will not even consider starting talks with Microsoft unless the suitor group offers at least $12 billion more, representing a share price value of more than $40. Yahoo! has suffered eight consecutive quarters of profit decline. Critically, it has also lost part of its share of the $40 billion online advertising market to Google, its dominant rival.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cluttermagnet

Very interesting posts, Jeber- thanks! From the article, the last couple of paragraphs were of greatest interest to me:

Microsoft is desperate to take over Yahoo! because of the threat that Google’s dominance of the online search advertising market poses to the computer company’s future. Last year, after long discussions about a merger between the two, Yahoo! declared that it was not for sale. However, it did agree to draw up proposals about how the two could co-operate to fight Google more effectively.Yahoo! is considered by Microsoft to have reneged on its pledge and Microsoft has become increasingly frustrated in the past 12 months as Google has grown stronger and Yahoo! has lost market share and been forced to cut 1,000 jobs.
This gives a greater sense of Microsoft's desperation, and could also be read and interpreted as saying that MS and Yahoo were really already 'in bed together'. These are tidal forces, these mergers. Big fish eaten by bigger fish, eaten by still bigger fish- ad nauseum. Where it all leads is not pretty. :thumbsup:(See also: "Middle ages", "feudalism", "nobility", "serfs", "poverty", "perpetual warfare", etc.) The utmost concentration of power leads inevitably to the utmost abuse and degradation of the people (with the exception of tiny elites). Nothing new under the sun; this appears to recur regularly, on roughly a thousand year cycle.
Microsoft is thought to be trying to engage Yahoo! shareholders in some form of discussion. It is also understood to be considering a proxy fight in the next month, in which it plans to oust most of the Yahoo! board and replace key executives with its own choice of management team.
Here is the 'end run' I mentioned in a previous post. MS is not to be trifled with. They have eaten many 'big fish' already. But I think they will mainly get indigestion from this one. 'Not in areas of core competency', etc. Desperation indeed. Edited by Cluttermagnet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would seem to validate my opinion that AOL, Yahoo and MS are similar in style and outlook.
Not so much, TimeWarner is planning on breaking up AOL and selling it off so I don't think comparing it to MS works. :thumbsup:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...