A team of Internet security researchers says a small number of public encryption keys offer "no security at all"
By Evan Applegate
from Business Week:
First, the bad news: A small number of active RSA public encryption keys, a popular type of encryption protocol that secures billions of online transactions, offer “no security at all.”
read more --> http://www.businessweek.com/technology/res...c-02162012.html
Researchers Detail Flaw in Online Cryptography
Started by
V.T. Eric Layton
, Feb 16 2012 12:48 PM
3 replies to this topic
#1 OFFLINE
Posted 16 February 2012 - 12:48 PM
![]()
#2 OFFLINE
Posted 16 February 2012 - 03:10 PM
Interesting, thanks


π ∞Comhack.com/CNI Radio/Linux User #363317/G+/Configs
"Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain." -George Orwell, 1984
#3 OFFLINE
Posted 16 February 2012 - 03:32 PM
http://twit.tv/show/security-now/340
Leo and Steve Gibson discuss this in their latest episode of Security Now. This is certainly an issue that needs to be fixed, but is certainly not something that is really deployable as a threat today. Essentially this works only if you have a public key and a private kay that have one of their factors that is the same. In short, this is a highly limited number, and the attacker would have to know who you are, what system you are connecting to, and that systems key.
Not really practical to deploy at this point.
Adam
Leo and Steve Gibson discuss this in their latest episode of Security Now. This is certainly an issue that needs to be fixed, but is certainly not something that is really deployable as a threat today. Essentially this works only if you have a public key and a private kay that have one of their factors that is the same. In short, this is a highly limited number, and the attacker would have to know who you are, what system you are connecting to, and that systems key.
Not really practical to deploy at this point.
Adam
#4 OFFLINE
Posted 16 February 2012 - 04:47 PM
QUOTE (ross549 @ Feb 16 2012, 01:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
http://twit.tv/show/security-now/340
Leo and Steve Gibson discuss this in their latest episode of Security Now. This is certainly an issue that needs to be fixed, but is certainly not something that is really deployable as a threat today. Essentially this works only if you have a public key and a private kay that have one of their factors that is the same. In short, this is a highly limited number, and the attacker would have to know who you are, what system you are connecting to, and that systems key.
Not really practical to deploy at this point.
Adam
Leo and Steve Gibson discuss this in their latest episode of Security Now. This is certainly an issue that needs to be fixed, but is certainly not something that is really deployable as a threat today. Essentially this works only if you have a public key and a private kay that have one of their factors that is the same. In short, this is a highly limited number, and the attacker would have to know who you are, what system you are connecting to, and that systems key.
Not really practical to deploy at this point.
Adam
Thanks


π ∞Comhack.com/CNI Radio/Linux User #363317/G+/Configs
"Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain." -George Orwell, 1984
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












