Jump to content


How good are your browsers?


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   tforsman

tforsman

    Message Mogul

  • Linux Devs
  • 264 posts

Posted 17 April 2011 - 03:19 PM

Iv'e been testing the biggest browsers (firefox3, 4, Chromium, Opera) and ended up with a result i didnt think I would get.http://clients.futur...action?key=5TW8Posted ImageUploaded with ImageShack.usSeems firefox need to optimize their browser alot more to render sites faster :)Run your test here: http://clients.futuremark.com/peacekeeper/index.action
Foresight | Blog | I've heard: When the RedHat developers present new packages to Linux User-Group, before the meeting is over,Foresight people will have downloaded the source, created a Foresight package, uploaded it,and it will be available for anyone to use.

#2 OFFLINE   tforsman

tforsman

    Message Mogul

  • Linux Devs
  • 264 posts

Posted 21 May 2011 - 01:47 PM

another benchmark with ffox 4 and chromium 11 tooPosted Image
Foresight | Blog | I've heard: When the RedHat developers present new packages to Linux User-Group, before the meeting is over,Foresight people will have downloaded the source, created a Foresight package, uploaded it,and it will be available for anyone to use.

#3 OFFLINE   abarbarian

abarbarian

    Discussion Deity

  • Forum MVP
  • 3,703 posts

Posted 21 May 2011 - 03:21 PM

http://imgur.com/tucSu3605 for FF 4.01 in Arch 64 here.  ;)
Install ARCH
You'll never need to install it again
"I did and I'm really happy"

Posted Image~~~~~~~~~~~~~Posted Image

#4 ONLINE   securitybreach

securitybreach

    CLI Phreak

  • Forum Admins
  • 16,082 posts

Posted 21 May 2011 - 04:08 PM

9929 in Chrome 13.0.767.15083 in Firefox 4.0.1
Posted ImagePosted Image Posted Image
CNI Radio/Archlinux G+/Configs/PGP Key π

"Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain." -George Orwell, 1984

#5 OFFLINE   colin.p

colin.p

    Post Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 112 posts

Posted 21 May 2011 - 05:13 PM

Firefox(v4.0.1) Scored:3171 PointsChrome(v11.0.696.68) Scored:6689 PointsI noticed the test in FF, especially the spaceships. were alot choppier. Might have spilled my beer, if I were in those ships, while I could have ate soup out of the bowl in Chrome. ;)
Colin
Registered Linux User #318277
The Ubuntu Counter Project - user number # 25648

#6 OFFLINE   tforsman

tforsman

    Message Mogul

  • Linux Devs
  • 264 posts

Posted 21 May 2011 - 05:32 PM

looks like always ffox always gets behind chromium, no mather what you do ;)
Foresight | Blog | I've heard: When the RedHat developers present new packages to Linux User-Group, before the meeting is over,Foresight people will have downloaded the source, created a Foresight package, uploaded it,and it will be available for anyone to use.

#7 OFFLINE   ChipDoc

ChipDoc

    Forum Fiend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,752 posts

Posted 22 May 2011 - 04:23 AM

I think it's because of Chrome's constant update cycle...Chrome 11.0.696.689559 Points
Think! It's patriotic!
Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like evil spirits at the dawn of day.
Thomas Jefferson, 1816
  Registered Linux User: 526339 , Check out The Bodhi Guide To Enlightenment

#8 OFFLINE   V.T. Eric Layton

V.T. Eric Layton

    Nocturnal Slacker

  • Forum MVP
  • 19,009 posts

Posted 22 May 2011 - 01:12 PM

No it's more likely because G-Chrome is a lot leaner than most folks' FFs. If I were to strip my FF down to the same minimal capabilities of G-Chrome, it would probably score as good or better on these benchmark tests. The reality here is that these tests are unfair because the do not test the browsers in similar situations and setups. It's like running a 1/4 mile drag between a 70 Ford Mustang Mach I with a 351cu Cleveland engine against a 70 Camaro Z28 with and LT1 350cu and 500lbs of bricks in the trunk. Stripped to minimal capabilities, these two vehicles are somewhat evenly matched. However, add some "extensions" and "addons" in the form of bricks to the Camaro and you have an unfair match-up.

Posted Image


Have a creepy little Halloween!


#9 OFFLINE   ChipDoc

ChipDoc

    Forum Fiend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,752 posts

Posted 24 May 2011 - 06:28 AM

View PostV.T. Eric Layton, on May 22 2011, 01:12 PM, said:

Stripped to minimal capabilities, these two vehicles are somewhat evenly matched. However, add some "extensions" and "addons" in the form of bricks to the Camaro and you have an unfair match-up.
Yet I'm running extensions and addons in Chrome too.  Admittedly, I'm only running 8 of them, but it's a lot more than I ever ran in IE.Perhaps I'm only carrying 100lbs of bricks in the trunk...  :">
Think! It's patriotic!
Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like evil spirits at the dawn of day.
Thomas Jefferson, 1816
  Registered Linux User: 526339 , Check out The Bodhi Guide To Enlightenment

#10 OFFLINE   sunrat

sunrat

    Discussion Deity

  • Forum Moderators
  • 4,429 posts

Posted 01 March 2012 - 03:38 AM

Digging up an old thread here. I just ran Peacekeeper with Chromium 16 and Iceweasel 10. Scores are way lower than some posted above, but whether that's due to slow ADSL connection or graphics card or something else, I don't know. Still, more impressive than Ipad 2's 374! smile.gif
I did notice that Chromium skipped the WebGL test and IW skipped the H264 test. Also IW has about 8 add-ons whereas Chromium has none.

Chromium 16:
3502
HTML5 Capabilities 6/7

Iceweasel 10:
1802
HTML5 Capabilities 6/7

It would be good if you guys who posted before would rerun with your latest browser versions. I think this test is probably not reliable to compare systems, but mainly to compare browsers on the same system. I'd also be interested to know if the test has changed since you last ran it.
The new URL for this test is http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/
registered Linux user number 324659  || The importance of Reading The *Fine* Manual! :D
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image Posted Image MX-14
For the things we have to learn before we can do them, we learn by doing them.

#11 OFFLINE   abarbarian

abarbarian

    Discussion Deity

  • Forum MVP
  • 3,703 posts

Posted 01 March 2012 - 07:33 AM

Arch 64

FF 10.0.2

1495 HTML5 Capabilities 5/7

cool.gif

That is twice as slow as 9 months ago an a lot slower than sunrats latest figures ofr Iceweasle 10 and Chromium. Looks like FF is suffering from old age syndrome.  laugh.gif

Edited by abarbarian, 01 March 2012 - 07:36 AM.

Install ARCH
You'll never need to install it again
"I did and I'm really happy"

Posted Image~~~~~~~~~~~~~Posted Image

#12 ONLINE   securitybreach

securitybreach

    CLI Phreak

  • Forum Admins
  • 16,082 posts

Posted 01 March 2012 - 10:29 AM

I am starting to believe that these tests are meaningless as my numbers are not even close to last time:

SRWare Iron 17.0.1000.0:     2778
Firefox 10.0.2:                      1932
Chrome 19.0.1055.1:             3304


From back in May:

Chrome 13.0.767.1: 9929
Firefox 4.0.1: 5083

So either these tests are crap or the development has went way down on both FF and Chome.
Posted ImagePosted Image Posted Image
CNI Radio/Archlinux G+/Configs/PGP Key π

"Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain." -George Orwell, 1984

#13 OFFLINE   tforsman

tforsman

    Message Mogul

  • Linux Devs
  • 264 posts

Posted 01 March 2012 - 01:10 PM

you guys are running beta test.

QUOTE
Try out the new BETA version of Peacekeeper - now works with any browser on any device, from desktops and notebooks, to tablets and smartphones. Includes many new and improved tests to give you a more accurate way of measuring and comparing browser performance.


Thats why you guys get so different results than before. run older one to see real results against older tests:

http://clients.futuremark.com/peacekeeper1/index.action

But i recommend to run newer one from now on, tests html5 and such stuff that are "useful" for a user to know about. As html5 is the future smile.gif
Foresight | Blog | I've heard: When the RedHat developers present new packages to Linux User-Group, before the meeting is over,Foresight people will have downloaded the source, created a Foresight package, uploaded it,and it will be available for anyone to use.

#14 ONLINE   securitybreach

securitybreach

    CLI Phreak

  • Forum Admins
  • 16,082 posts

Posted 01 March 2012 - 03:06 PM

Thanks Tomas, that makes sense thumbsup.gif


SRWare Iron 17.0.1000.0 = 9002

Compared with 2778 from above
Posted ImagePosted Image Posted Image
CNI Radio/Archlinux G+/Configs/PGP Key π

"Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain." -George Orwell, 1984

#15 OFFLINE   sunrat

sunrat

    Discussion Deity

  • Forum Moderators
  • 4,429 posts

Posted 01 March 2012 - 06:11 PM

QUOTE (tforsman @ Mar 2 2012, 04:10 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
you guys are running beta test.

As I suspected - different test. Thanks.

registered Linux user number 324659  || The importance of Reading The *Fine* Manual! :D
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image Posted Image MX-14
For the things we have to learn before we can do them, we learn by doing them.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users