epp_b Posted May 6, 2006 Share Posted May 6, 2006 http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?si...045255&from=rssThis is ridiculous and frivolous in so many ways. Not only is it unreasonable to expect SA to be responsable for the actions of thousands of forum users who happen to use their site, but the image isn't even hosted by SA! And even if, through some slimy legal maneuver, they were found responsible, it's ridiculous anyway!If Apple had half a brain, they would use this as an opportunity to correct their seemingly-lousy manufacturing in this case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
havnblast Posted May 6, 2006 Share Posted May 6, 2006 (edited) Wow, nothing like drawing more attention to your flaws huh? You really got to wonder what people are thinking at times. Is retardation a preqreuisite to going to law school?by ginnal on 05/03/06 04:08 PM Edited May 6, 2006 by havnblast Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
epp_b Posted May 6, 2006 Author Share Posted May 6, 2006 Yup, enjoyed that one too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b2cm Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 Is retardation a preqreuisite to going to law school?No. A personal belief that a jury is just a collection of retards is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webb Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 I wouldn't want Scot to be sued so you'll have to click here for the offensive image. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 (edited) http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?si...045255&from=rssThis is ridiculous and frivolous in so many ways. Not only is it unreasonable to expect SA to be responsable for the actions of thousands of forum users who happen to use their site, but the image isn't even hosted by SA! And even if, through some slimy legal maneuver, they were found responsible, it's ridiculous anyway!If Apple had half a brain, they would use this as an opportunity to correct their seemingly-lousy manufacturing in this case.Yes it is. Edited May 8, 2006 by Gary Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
epp_b Posted May 10, 2006 Author Share Posted May 10, 2006 car manufacturers kill people...The last three I can understand, but can you're going to have to explain this one... :hmm:Cars are not "inherently" bad for you, unlike the last three you list. If you're saying that it's because of crashes, you can't blame that on the manufacturer, you need to blame that of the driver. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b2cm Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 Not all copyrighted material can be subjected to 'fair use'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webb Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 And the only similarity between copyright infringement lawsuits and product liability lawsuits is that they both take place in court. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.