Jump to content


NSA ends surveillance tactic that pulled in citizens' emails, text

Today, 10:01 AM

Posted by Computerworld in Computerworld News

The U.S. National Security Agency will no longer sift through emails, texts and other internet communications that mention targets of surveillance.

The change, which the NSA announced on Friday, stops a controversial tactic that critics said violated U.S. citizens' privacy rights.

The practice involved flagging communications where a foreign surveillance target was mentioned, even if that target wasn't involved in the conversation. Friday’s announcement means the NSA will stop collecting this data.

“Instead, this surveillance will now be limited to only those communications that are directly ‘to’ or ‘from’ a foreign intelligence target,” the NSA said in a statement.

To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here

View the full article

5 Views · 0 Replies


linux, "parent" distros, derivatives

Today, 01:25 AM

Posted by saturnian in Bruno's All Things Linux
None of what follows is meant to knock any particular distro. Different Linux users have different needs, and we don't all see things in the same ways (obviously)...

When one distro gets all or most of their packages directly from a "parent" distro's repos, I definitely tend to prefer to use the "parent" distro. Same thing if most of the documentation is coming from the "parent" distro. I guess this has a lot to do with why I eventually quit running Linux Mint, and why, even though I like Antergos, I don't like it (or other Arch-derivatives I've used) as much as Arch. I enjoy running Ubuntu, but I wouldn't replace Debian with Ubuntu. Some distros like BunsenLabs, MX, antiX, I think they're awesome but I don't prefer them over Debian.

BunsenLabs, for example, is actually one of my favorites, a very special distro for those who like Openbox, but I ended up replacing that with a Debian netinstall (with Openbox), which I feel has turned out better for me than BunsenLabs.

For me, the derivatives can be useful and I'm glad they're out there. But a lot of times, I'll run them in live sessions, or even install to the hard drive, then figure out how to get what I want (after seeing something in the derivative) from the "parent" distro. Too often, the derivative ships with a lot of stuff that I don't really want or need.

In some cases, I'll go with the derivative because it might work better on a particular computer, but then it seems like I can usually figure out how to do it with the "parent" later.

I do like having something like MX around for live sessions. Very useful, at times.

The derivatives are often quicker and easier to install, but it isn't like I'm needing to do an installation every other week or whatever. Seems to me that I have fewer hassles over the long term with the "parent" distros than with the derivatives. Maybe it takes a little longer, for example, to get Debian installed and set up than something else (seems a lot quicker and easier these days than it used to be, though), but after that it's good for a few years.

Seems like I put myself in a better situation if I've learned to use the "parent" distro well. With the derivative, I end up feeling like I need to know how the parent distro works anyway.

And I am not installing for other people, only for myself.

What a distro looks like out-of-the-box isn't of much concern to me; it's about what I end up with (for this reason, most distro reviews I see are kinda useless to me -- seems like they're usually done by someone who has looked at the installation for a few weeks, at most, not by somebody who's been using it for the past couple of years).

Lately, I kinda feel like one distro is as good as the next, but I guess that depends on what the user is looking for.

Other considerations for me: The dev teams, and how long the distro has been around. Seen too many nice one-man distros come and go (one I kinda miss: SalineOS).

Maybe I should just install Slackware and quit screwing around. :)

Or not.

37 Views · 0 Replies


54% off SanDisk Extreme PRO 128GB USB 3.0 Flash Drive, Speeds Up To 26

27 Apr 2017

Posted by Computerworld in Computerworld News

The SanDisk Extreme PRO USB 3.0 Flash Drive features a sizable 128GB of storage, and read speeds of up to 260MB/s lets you easily transfer a full-length movie in seconds.The sophisticated design and durable aluminum metal casing help to protect against every day wear and tear on the outside, while the included SanDisk SecureAccess software provides 128-bit AES file encryption and password protection on the inside for your private files. The SanDisk Extreme PRO USB 3.0 Flash Drive is backed with a lifetime limited warranty. It currently averages 4.6 out of 5 stars on Amazon from over 530 people (80% rate the full 5 stars: seereviews here), and its typical list price has been reduced generously to just $59.99. See this deal on Amazon.

To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here

View the full article

6 Views · 0 Replies

Latest Discussions

Site Navigation

Online Users

0 members, 51 visitors and 0 anonymous users

Yahoo, Bing, Google

Portal v1.1.0 by DevFuse | Based on IP.Board Portal by IPS