


How good are your browsers?
#1 OFFLINE
Posted 17 April 2011 - 03:19 PM

#2 OFFLINE
#3 OFFLINE
Posted 21 May 2011 - 03:21 PM
#4 OFFLINE
Posted 21 May 2011 - 04:08 PM



CNI Radio/G+ Profile/Configs/PGP Key/comhack π ∞
"Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain." -George Orwell, 1984
#5 OFFLINE
Posted 21 May 2011 - 05:13 PM

Registered Linux User #318277
The Ubuntu Counter Project - user number # 25648
#6 OFFLINE
Posted 21 May 2011 - 05:32 PM

#7 OFFLINE
Posted 22 May 2011 - 04:23 AM

#8 OFFLINE
Posted 22 May 2011 - 01:12 PM
#9 OFFLINE
Posted 24 May 2011 - 06:28 AM
V.T. Eric Layton, on May 22 2011, 01:12 PM, said:


#10 OFFLINE
Posted 01 March 2012 - 03:38 AM

I did notice that Chromium skipped the WebGL test and IW skipped the H264 test. Also IW has about 8 add-ons whereas Chromium has none.
Chromium 16:
3502
HTML5 Capabilities 6/7
Iceweasel 10:
1802
HTML5 Capabilities 6/7
It would be good if you guys who posted before would rerun with your latest browser versions. I think this test is probably not reliable to compare systems, but mainly to compare browsers on the same system. I'd also be interested to know if the test has changed since you last ran it.
The new URL for this test is http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/




For the things we have to learn before we can do them, we learn by doing them.
#11 OFFLINE
Posted 01 March 2012 - 07:33 AM
FF 10.0.2
1495 HTML5 Capabilities 5/7

That is twice as slow as 9 months ago an a lot slower than sunrats latest figures ofr Iceweasle 10 and Chromium. Looks like FF is suffering from old age syndrome.

Edited by abarbarian, 01 March 2012 - 07:36 AM.
#12 OFFLINE
Posted 01 March 2012 - 10:29 AM
SRWare Iron 17.0.1000.0: 2778
Firefox 10.0.2: 1932
Chrome 19.0.1055.1: 3304
From back in May:
Chrome 13.0.767.1: 9929
Firefox 4.0.1: 5083
So either these tests are crap or the development has went way down on both FF and Chome.



CNI Radio/G+ Profile/Configs/PGP Key/comhack π ∞
"Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain." -George Orwell, 1984
#13 OFFLINE
Posted 01 March 2012 - 01:10 PM
Thats why you guys get so different results than before. run older one to see real results against older tests:
http://clients.futuremark.com/peacekeeper1/index.action
But i recommend to run newer one from now on, tests html5 and such stuff that are "useful" for a user to know about. As html5 is the future

#14 OFFLINE
Posted 01 March 2012 - 03:06 PM

SRWare Iron 17.0.1000.0 = 9002
Compared with 2778 from above



CNI Radio/G+ Profile/Configs/PGP Key/comhack π ∞
"Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain." -George Orwell, 1984
#15 OFFLINE
Posted 01 March 2012 - 06:11 PM
As I suspected - different test. Thanks.




For the things we have to learn before we can do them, we learn by doing them.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users