135 Views · 14 Replies ( Last reply by V.T. Eric Layton )
About 15 years ago - when my eyes started failing - I put together a nice Nikon film system with autofocus capability. This replaced an even older Nikon manual system that I had used for 20 years before that.
In 2002 film was having a last hurrah and digital still could not compete with 35 mm on image quality. I got an enthusiast's film camera - not professional grade - and some nice (mostly used) lenses.
By 2008 I was almost entirely digital and the film system sat idle. I never got an actual DSLR system until 2015.
The old lenses are (sort of) compatible with my newer digital camera body although they will only focus manually. The new digital lens system is a lot nicer. So what to do with the old system?
- Sell it. The film camera body is essentially worthless but the lenses have held some of their value. However, it would be a hassle and I doubt I would get enough to justify the time and expense of eBay or KEH.
- Use the lenses. They will focus manually although they lack a lot of features I like on the newer lenses. I could get a heavier, more expensive digital body that would autofocus them but I doubt this would give me a lot of value for money. The newer lightweight system is just so much nicer, and it cost less than buying just the pro-grade digital body.
- Store it. It doesn't take up all that much space. Film shooting has never entirely gone away and maybe one of my grandchildren will get interested in photography and want to try old school analog film. I personally will stay digital. I've paid my dues with carrying film cartridges, loading, rewinding, processing.
So keeping them in the museum is no more of a waste than keeping an old laptop. That's how I see it anyway.
I had brought along my Nikon DSLR, extra lenses and a large flash in a camera bag. My wife thought I was nuts. Maybe I was. At the very least I was a dinosaur.
About 30 people took photos - 29 with a smartphone and me with my Nikon. I didn't use the flash at the church - light was pretty good and the big camera handles lower light situations well.
When we took photos of the family with Veronica, later on, I put the honking big flash on the camera to avoid red-eye and fill in the images. Took about 70 shots with no worry about the battery dying in the middle of it all.
Since I had the only real camera there I could be authoritative and get a big crowd in line to take the picture. I doubt that would have happened with a smartphone in hand. Put my SD card in my son-in-law's laptop and he had the photos instantly.
Some wonderful memories were made along with the images. But oh my did I feel weird at the church with the only actual camera. The art of photography has changed to be smartphone-based - even in the couple of years since my grandson's first communion.
163 Views · 6 Replies ( Last reply by V.T. Eric Layton )
raymac46 - Today, 09:43 AM
Looks Like Spring Has Arrived
raymac46 - Apr 24 2018 07:54 AM
More chronicles of a dinosaur
raymac46 - Apr 23 2018 07:16 AM
distrowatch poll -- dual booting versus virtual machines
saturnian - Apr 23 2018 12:29 AM
bunsenlabs helium rc1
saturnian - Apr 22 2018 10:06 AM
raymac46 - Apr 19 2018 09:21 AM
Meet Mycroft: An Open Source Virtual Assistant
abarbarian - Apr 19 2018 05:33 AM
One Note Changes
Corrine - Apr 18 2018 12:32 PM
Oracle Java™ Critical Security Updates Released
Corrine - Apr 18 2018 08:46 AM
Pale Moon Version 27.9.0 Released
Corrine - Apr 17 2018 10:43 AM
Windows 7 64 bit shows red cross on network icon
zillah - Apr 16 2018 06:09 AM
GoScanSSH malware infects a range of Linux devices
abarbarian - Apr 16 2018 05:33 AM
Corrine - Apr 15 2018 03:39 PM
Microsoft Windows - a mouse with modest requirements.
abarbarian - Apr 15 2018 11:01 AM
Deepin Linux is Spyware
securitybreach - Apr 14 2018 11:33 AM
Google, Bing, Pete!, Yahoo