Jump to content


TP Link TL-WN725N Wireless Adapter


  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   raymac46

raymac46

    Discussion Deity

  • Forum MVP
  • 3,414 posts

Posted 09 August 2017 - 09:16 AM

Oh sure you can get Atheros based wifi adapters like the TL-WN722N but they tend to be bulky and best suited for use in a desktop. If you want something that takes up less real estate it's pretty had to find anything with Atheros - Realtek seems to have the market cornered here. For example there's the TL-WN725N nano. This little gem works great with Windows but until recently it failed spectacularly with Linux. At first it didn't work at all. Then you could download the source from Git, build the module and install it. However the next kernel update put you back to square one.
Now with the latest kernels the TL-WN725N works right out of the box, If you are looking for something much smaller than the big Atheros wifi adapter, this might be the one for you. Mine is version 2.1 and it's running well with Linux Mint and MX-16.

Edited by raymac46, 09 August 2017 - 09:18 AM.

Posted Image

Registered Linux User 445659

#2 OFFLINE   securitybreach

securitybreach

    CLI Phreak

  • Forum Admins
  • 23,173 posts

Posted 09 August 2017 - 09:28 AM

I use this one for my Pi. It has a realtek chipset but it does support monitor mode and works with linux out of the box: EDIMAX EW-7811Un N150

Posted Image
Posted ImagePosted Image Posted Image
CNI Radio/G+ Profile/Configs/PGP Key/comhack π

"Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain." -George Orwell, 1984

#3 OFFLINE   Digerati

Digerati

    Post Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 09 August 2017 - 11:54 AM

Those little nano adapters are great IF your computer is not too distant, or have too many barriers (walls, floors, ceilings) between the computer and your WAP (wireless access point). But if distance, barriers, or other sources of interference are, or might be a problem, I recommend an adapter with an adjustable exterior antenna.

For PCs, I much prefer Ethernet. But if running a cable to the PC is not practical, I recommend a PCIe Adapter like the Dual Band TP-Link N900. Dual band helps to avoid congestion. PCIe avoids the hassles that often come with the USB interface. And the exterior, adjustable antennas help ensure the best reception on both ends. And with detachable antennas, you can even position the antennas up high, if necessary.
Posted Image Bill (AFE7Ret)
Freedom is NOT Free!
Posted Image Windows and Devices for IT, 2007 - 2018

Heat is the bane of all electronics!

____________________________________________

#4 OFFLINE   raymac46

raymac46

    Discussion Deity

  • Forum MVP
  • 3,414 posts

Posted 09 August 2017 - 07:14 PM

View Postsecuritybreach, on 09 August 2017 - 09:28 AM, said:

I use this one for my Pi. It has a realtek chipset but it does support monitor mode and works with linux out of the box: EDIMAX EW-7811Un N150
.
Posted Image

Yup a good one that has been supported for quite a while

Edited by raymac46, 09 August 2017 - 07:15 PM.

Posted Image

Registered Linux User 445659

#5 OFFLINE   raymac46

raymac46

    Discussion Deity

  • Forum MVP
  • 3,414 posts

Posted 09 August 2017 - 07:22 PM

I keep the small USB adapters around for use in SFF desktops that might not accept a PCIe based adapter. Given a wider full size case and an available PCIe slot I would go with a dual antenna setup - and I have in my main Linux desktop. Wifi does a good enough job in my house that I don't need to run cables. The Windows desktop that sits right next to the router has an Ethernet cable.
Posted Image

Registered Linux User 445659

#6 OFFLINE   Digerati

Digerati

    Post Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 10 August 2017 - 11:46 AM

Quote

The Windows desktop that sits right next to the router has an Ethernet cable.
Ethernet is definitely the way to go, if practical. Not only do you totally eliminate reception issues, Ethernet networking is inherently more secure. But often punching holes in walls, floors and ceilings is not practical so wifi may be the only viable alternative.
Posted Image Bill (AFE7Ret)
Freedom is NOT Free!
Posted Image Windows and Devices for IT, 2007 - 2018

Heat is the bane of all electronics!

____________________________________________

#7 OFFLINE   raymac46

raymac46

    Discussion Deity

  • Forum MVP
  • 3,414 posts

Posted 11 August 2017 - 08:33 AM

I just did a couple of bandwidth tests and I was geiing 43 Mbits down on wifi N downstairs in my basement through a wooden floor. That is plenty fast enough for anything I'd want to do. On the wire next to the router I'd get close to 185 down on a good day.
Posted Image

Registered Linux User 445659

#8 OFFLINE   Peachy

Peachy

    Anarquista De Sartorial

  • Forum Moderators
  • 5,432 posts

Posted 12 August 2017 - 10:49 AM

I have one Raspberry Pi with the Edimax nano setup as a WiFi access point. It is pretty stable as Linux is. Love this.

'freedom...is actually the reason that men live together in political organisations at all. Without it, political life as such would be meaningless. The raison d'Être of politics is freedom, and its field of experience is action'.
My Flickr Photo Blog Posted Image
del.icio.us bookmarks Posted Image


#9 OFFLINE   raymac46

raymac46

    Discussion Deity

  • Forum MVP
  • 3,414 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 08:13 AM

Of course  the WN725N Nano works great with Windows 10 as you would expect.
My Lenovo Flex laptop has a balky Atheros internal wifi adapter that drops connections all the time. I shut it off in the BIOS and plugged in the WN725N. It's fast and reliable and doesn't take up more room than a typical wifi mouse dongle. It would be great on old laptops if you want to upgrade to N performance.
Posted Image

Registered Linux User 445659

#10 OFFLINE   Digerati

Digerati

    Post Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 11:19 AM

Quote

balky Atheros internal wifi adapter
:wassat-huh: If it is internal, how is it balky?
Posted Image Bill (AFE7Ret)
Freedom is NOT Free!
Posted Image Windows and Devices for IT, 2007 - 2018

Heat is the bane of all electronics!

____________________________________________

#11 OFFLINE   raymac46

raymac46

    Discussion Deity

  • Forum MVP
  • 3,414 posts

Posted 21 August 2017 - 01:27 PM

It drops the signal randomly. It's a design flaw in the chipset I believe. Driver updates have never fixed it.
Posted Image

Registered Linux User 445659

#12 OFFLINE   raymac46

raymac46

    Discussion Deity

  • Forum MVP
  • 3,414 posts

Posted 22 August 2017 - 06:43 AM

I have decided to give the internal wifi another try in my Lenovo Flex2-15D laptop. I have taken a new suggestion to disable Bluetooth (the adapter is a combination of wifi-N and Bluetooth.) Also I have a new gateway and no longer use a wifi extender network which may have confused things. So far the internal adapter seems stable. We'll see.
Posted Image

Registered Linux User 445659

#13 OFFLINE   securitybreach

securitybreach

    CLI Phreak

  • Forum Admins
  • 23,173 posts

Posted 22 August 2017 - 07:49 AM

Good deal :thumbsup:
Posted ImagePosted Image Posted Image
CNI Radio/G+ Profile/Configs/PGP Key/comhack π

"Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain." -George Orwell, 1984

#14 OFFLINE   Digerati

Digerati

    Post Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 22 August 2017 - 09:08 AM

Quote

It drops the signal randomly. It's a design flaw in the chipset I believe.
I disagree. If a design flaw, it would affect every unit in that model and revision line - that is, potentially 100s of 1000s of users would have the same problem and the maker would be forced (due to bad publicity and public backlash) to do a recall. It is much more likely to be a defective unit.

Edit comment: fixed typos.

Edited by Digerati, 22 August 2017 - 11:18 AM.

Posted Image Bill (AFE7Ret)
Freedom is NOT Free!
Posted Image Windows and Devices for IT, 2007 - 2018

Heat is the bane of all electronics!

____________________________________________

#15 OFFLINE   securitybreach

securitybreach

    CLI Phreak

  • Forum Admins
  • 23,173 posts

Posted 22 August 2017 - 09:13 AM

View PostDigerati, on 22 August 2017 - 09:08 AM, said:

Quote

It drops the signal randomly. It's a design flaw in the chipset I believe.
I disagree. If a design flaw, it would affect every unit in that model and revision line - that is, potentially 100s of 100s of 1000s of users would have the same problem and the maker would be forced (due to bad publicity and public backlash) to do a recall. It is much more likely to get a defective unit.

Agreed
Posted ImagePosted Image Posted Image
CNI Radio/G+ Profile/Configs/PGP Key/comhack π

"Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain." -George Orwell, 1984

#16 OFFLINE   raymac46

raymac46

    Discussion Deity

  • Forum MVP
  • 3,414 posts

Posted 22 August 2017 - 03:47 PM

I'm not so sure. This chip has caused problems in a variety of laptops, not just Lenovo and there doesn't appear to be an obvious fix. It is a combination Bluetooth and wifi solution so that could be an issue. Certainly updating software had no positive effect, nor did disabling power management options which may have switched the wifi off.

https://answers.micr...5612bb98?auth=1

This adapter gave problems from the start with Windows 8.1 and so it isn't simply a Windows 10 upgrade problem. Disabling Bluetooth seems to be a solution. If you are going to have trouble it usually occurs in the first 10 minutes or so. Suddenly your connection is gone, you can't surf the web. You have to disconnect and reconnect and then maybe you'll get another 10 minutes.
Another reason I think it's something in the chip is that any USB adapter with a Realtek or even an older Atheros chip in it worked stably with the laptop. Never an issue.
However the new gateway may have helped as well.
Posted Image

Registered Linux User 445659

#17 OFFLINE   Digerati

Digerati

    Post Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 22 August 2017 - 04:48 PM

One link to a different adapter means nothing. Even if to the exact same adapter, that does not suggest a design flaw. Again, if it were a design flaw, there would be 1000s and 1000s of people having the EXACT same problem.
Posted Image Bill (AFE7Ret)
Freedom is NOT Free!
Posted Image Windows and Devices for IT, 2007 - 2018

Heat is the bane of all electronics!

____________________________________________

#18 OFFLINE   Digerati

Digerati

    Post Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 22 August 2017 - 10:34 PM

I saw your reply before it was deleted. I am sorry you are taking this personally, but losing connectivity is just a common "symptom" that can be caused by many different problems.

It can only be a "design flaw" if the cause of the connectivity loss is due the exact same "discrete" component, circuit, code, etc. failing in each case.

Lenovo is the world's 2nd largest computer maker having just been leapfrogged by HP. Lenovo sold over 50 million! :blink: computers in the 4th quarter of 2016 alone with most of those being laptops. "Hundreds of posts online" complaining of connectivity issues is but a drop in the ocean and on top of that, in no way points to a specific device, circuit, or bit of code failing - or specific Alteros device either.  It is not a design flaw. If it was, there will be 100s of 1000s of complaints on-line, in tech news articles, and elsewhere pointing out specific models. Not 100s of vague "lost connection" posts.  And that's just Lenovo. Many notebook makers use Atheros adapters and many wifi adapter makers use Atheros as their OEM suppliers. And Atheros makes several different adapters of various designs too.
Posted Image Bill (AFE7Ret)
Freedom is NOT Free!
Posted Image Windows and Devices for IT, 2007 - 2018

Heat is the bane of all electronics!

____________________________________________

#19 OFFLINE   raymac46

raymac46

    Discussion Deity

  • Forum MVP
  • 3,414 posts

Posted 23 August 2017 - 07:44 AM

For now the internal adapter is stable. I don't think I've identified the root cause but I have not had the dropped connections since I disabled Bluetooth (one of the suggestions I found in another forum.) However I now am using a different router and have taken out a wifi repeater unit which also could have caused problems. I don't run Linux on this laptop except in a VM so I cannot say for sure.how it would work with the Linux Atheros module (likely ath9K.)
I have also updated the driver to 10.0.0.350 which is the latest Windows 10 at atheros-drivers.com

Edited by raymac46, 23 August 2017 - 08:09 AM.

Posted Image

Registered Linux User 445659

#20 OFFLINE   Digerati

Digerati

    Post Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 23 August 2017 - 12:12 PM

Quote

but I have not had the dropped connections since I disabled Bluetooth (one of the suggestions I found in another forum.)
In terms of the RF, there is no reason one should interfere with the other. Bluetooth operates at frequencies between 2400 and 2483.5 MHz. While wifi operates in the same 2.4GHz band which can be pretty crowded, they use totally different protocols. While that does not eliminate the possibility of interference, typically it is the Bluetooth signal that is affected because Bluetooth signals are so weak, ~1mW compared to wifi devices which typically are at least 100mW

Did you try changing your wifi channel in your WAP/router? And if your wifi devices (and WAP/router) support operation in the much less crowded 5GHz band, I would try that too.

I use XIRRUS WiFi Inspector to see what wireless channels are in use by nearby networks and which are available.
Posted Image Bill (AFE7Ret)
Freedom is NOT Free!
Posted Image Windows and Devices for IT, 2007 - 2018

Heat is the bane of all electronics!

____________________________________________

#21 OFFLINE   raymac46

raymac46

    Discussion Deity

  • Forum MVP
  • 3,414 posts

Posted 23 August 2017 - 02:28 PM

I re-enabled Bluetooth - not that I use it. I will see how things go, If all OK then I can rule out Bluetooth as a cause for the problem. Right now I am on channel 6 for IPV4 wifi. The AR956X chipset in the Flex2 15D does not support the 5Gz band.
Posted Image

Registered Linux User 445659

#22 OFFLINE   Digerati

Digerati

    Post Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 23 August 2017 - 05:28 PM

Quote

Right now I am on channel 6 for IPV4 wifi.
What's important is who else in your neighborhood is on ch 6. If you live in a house with other houses surrounding you, crowding is probably not a problem. But if you live in or very near an apartment complex, there could be several other wifi networks on the same or adjacent channels. Using WiFi inspector will show you all the wifi networks in your area, and the channel they are on so you can pick something several channels away. You change that in your AP.
Posted Image Bill (AFE7Ret)
Freedom is NOT Free!
Posted Image Windows and Devices for IT, 2007 - 2018

Heat is the bane of all electronics!

____________________________________________

#23 OFFLINE   raymac46

raymac46

    Discussion Deity

  • Forum MVP
  • 3,414 posts

Posted 23 August 2017 - 06:05 PM

Channel 6 is OK here. Closest neighbors are on Channels 1 & 2. I can see 21 wifi routers but any on Channel 6 besides me are very weak. I live in a house surrounded by other houses.

Edited by raymac46, 23 August 2017 - 06:06 PM.

Posted Image

Registered Linux User 445659

#24 OFFLINE   securitybreach

securitybreach

    CLI Phreak

  • Forum Admins
  • 23,173 posts

Posted 23 August 2017 - 06:35 PM

View Postraymac46, on 23 August 2017 - 06:05 PM, said:

Channel 6 is OK here. Closest neighbors are on Channels 1 & 2. I can see 21 wifi routers but any on Channel 6 besides me are very weak. I live in a house surrounded by other houses.

I always use channel 11 as it is the farthest away from the most common channel which is 6.
Posted ImagePosted Image Posted Image
CNI Radio/G+ Profile/Configs/PGP Key/comhack π

"Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain." -George Orwell, 1984

#25 OFFLINE   Digerati

Digerati

    Post Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 23 August 2017 - 08:53 PM

Quote

I can see 21 wifi routers but any on Channel 6 besides me are very weak.
If me, I would move to an open channel and not share with anyone.
Posted Image Bill (AFE7Ret)
Freedom is NOT Free!
Posted Image Windows and Devices for IT, 2007 - 2018

Heat is the bane of all electronics!

____________________________________________




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users